Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 15:19:44 +0100 (CET) From: Pieter Donche <Pieter.Donche@ua.ac.be> To: Ebbe Hjorth <ebbe.hjorth@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 7.0: which distribution Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.63.0812021517170.11808@hmacs.cmi.ua.ac.be> In-Reply-To: <1bd820d80812020457n15f1e6a0s9bd200db05b551f6@mail.gmail.com> References: <Pine.GSO.4.63.0812021323380.8329@hmacs.cmi.ua.ac.be> <1bd820d80812020437h5bd7266co67c566b386b8873e@mail.gmail.com> <Pine.GSO.4.63.0812021347330.9046@hmacs.cmi.ua.ac.be> <1bd820d80812020457n15f1e6a0s9bd200db05b551f6@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 2 Dec 2008, Ebbe Hjorth wrote: > 2008/12/2 Pieter Donche <Pieter.Donche@ua.ac.be> > On Tue, 2 Dec 2008, Ebbe Hjorth wrote: > Hi, > All new XEON cpus are 64-bit spo use the 64 bit freebsd version. > I never googled it before, but 2 sec gave me > http://www.freebsd.org/releases/7.0R/hardware.html#PROC-AMD64 > > So use the amd64 ;) Is the amd64 distribution mature enough, as compared to the i386? Aren't there any problems to be expected to arrive, months after initial install and way in the production usage ??
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.4.63.0812021517170.11808>