Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2010 16:07:03 +0100 From: Bruce Cran <bruce@cran.org.uk> To: Jeremy Chadwick <freebsd@jdc.parodius.com> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: boot0cfg problems Message-ID: <20101001160703.00005fc3@unknown> In-Reply-To: <20101001113434.GA43360@icarus.home.lan> References: <E1P1a0v-0009QQ-Rt@kabab.cs.huji.ac.il> <20101001090143.GA40450@icarus.home.lan> <E1P1dfO-000BRI-MZ@kabab.cs.huji.ac.il> <20101001113434.GA43360@icarus.home.lan>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 1 Oct 2010 04:34:34 -0700 Jeremy Chadwick <freebsd@jdc.parodius.com> wrote: > Anyway, if the MBR did get updated without kern.geom.debugflags having > bit 4 set, then wouldn't this indicate there's a bug in GEOM's "sector > 0" protection? Or that it knows that updating the active byte is harmless. -- Bruce Cran
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20101001160703.00005fc3>