Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 02 Mar 2013 10:51:38 -0500
From:      Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net>
To:        =?UTF-8?B?RGFnLUVybGluZyBTbcO4cmdyYXY=?= <des@des.no>
Cc:        stable@freebsd.org, svn-src-stable-9@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r247485 - in stable/9: crypto/openssh crypto/openssh/openbsd-compat secure/lib/libssh secure/usr.sbin/sshd
Message-ID:  <5132200A.8070500@sentex.net>
In-Reply-To: <86vc99rf3g.fsf@ds4.des.no>
References:  <201302281843.r1SIhoaq004371@svn.freebsd.org> <5130D8E0.3020605@sentex.net> <5130E9F1.6050308@sentex.net> <867glqsy4q.fsf@ds4.des.no> <513108C4.10501@sentex.net> <8638wesvu1.fsf@ds4.des.no> <51316CA3.8000301@sentex.net> <513204E9.1040006@sentex.net> <86vc99rf3g.fsf@ds4.des.no>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 3/2/2013 10:33 AM, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
> Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net> writes:
>> This PR looks to be related
>>
>> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-bugs/2012-September/050139.html
> 
> That suggests a bug in the aesni driver...

OK, but the above uses the glxsb driver, not the aesni driver. Also, if
at was aesni, would it not show up in the geli tests I did ?

> 
> Can you ktrace sshd in both cases?  My guess is the difference is that
> the new version uses hw offloading while the old version doesn't.

Done.  Both files are at http://www.tancsa.com/openssh

	---Mike

-- 
-------------------
Mike Tancsa, tel +1 519 651 3400
Sentex Communications, mike@sentex.net
Providing Internet services since 1994 www.sentex.net
Cambridge, Ontario Canada   http://www.tancsa.com/



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5132200A.8070500>