Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2000 23:36:09 -0300 (ART) From: "Fernando P. Schapachnik" <fernando@schapachnik.com.ar> To: lgriffin@bsd4us.org (Lyndon Griffin) Cc: freebsd-sparc@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Sparc Port -- sounds good to me Message-ID: <200001200236.XAA00948@localhost.schapachnik.com.ar> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSO.4.10.10001190716570.16200-100000@ns.bsd4us.org> from Lyndon Griffin at "Jan 19, 0 07:29:35 am"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
En un mensaje anterior Lyndon Griffin escribió: > While porting the kernel may be the most difficult, porting the userland > will certainly be tedious - once something is ported, it will need to Let me show my ignorance here. If we have a kernel running on SPARC and a native compiler working fine, isn't porting userland == make world? At least for the code that doesn't use assembler (which should be most of it)? (I asume a NO answer, but can't imagine why). Anyone care to enlighten me? Thanks! Fernando P. Schapachnik fernando@schapachnik.com.ar | Atención: Mensaje generado en entorno libre de productos M$. No contiene | | HTML, adjuntos en Word ni basura similar. Leer con tranquilidad. | To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-sparc" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200001200236.XAA00948>