Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 21 Sep 2004 01:25:00 +0400
From:      Roman Kurakin <rik@cronyx.ru>
To:        John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        Nate Lawson <nate@root.org>
Subject:   Re: mp_machdep.c (was Re: [Fwd: Re: Bug reports requested - acpi])
Message-ID:  <414F4AAC.5000807@cronyx.ru>
In-Reply-To: <200409201652.24457.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <41421D6A.8070805@cronyx.ru> <414E7581.2070505@root.org> <414F256B.1030304@cronyx.ru> <200409201652.24457.jhb@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
John Baldwin:

>On Monday 20 September 2004 02:46 pm, Roman Kurakin wrote:
>  
>
>>Hi,
>>
>>    I have problem with one of my SMP systems (see end of letter).
>>It looks that following patch:
>>
>>Index: mp_machdep.c
>>===================================================================
>>RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/i386/i386/mp_machdep.c,v
>>retrieving revision 1.238
>>diff -u -r1.238 mp_machdep.c
>>--- mp_machdep.c        1 Sep 2004 06:42:01 -0000       1.238
>>+++ mp_machdep.c        20 Sep 2004 18:20:49 -0000
>>@@ -747,6 +747,11 @@
>>        POSTCODE(INSTALL_AP_TRAMP_POST);
>>
>>        pmap_kenter(boot_address + KERNBASE, boot_address);
>>+#ifdef I386_CPU
>>+       invltlb();
>>+#else
>>+       invlpg((u_int)dst);
>>+#endif
>>        for (x = 0; x < size; ++x)
>>                *dst++ = *src++;
>>
>>solves the problem. I'll check it on not very recent hacked current.
>>So this is initial request. I'll check it with current current without my
>>hacks to double check that this works always and inform if this helps.
>>
>>    The intent of this letter to ask community if this workaround for my
>>problem or real bug fix. If this is only workaround please let me know
>>and I'll continue to dig with version I currently use.
>>(I don't like workarounds)
>>
>>Best regards,
>>                      Roman Kurakin
>>    
>>
>
>It's probably cleaner to use pmap_invalidate_range().  Something like:
>
Hm, what about pmap_invalidate_page () or even pmap_map () ?

Index: mp_machdep.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /usr/cvs/src/sys/i386/i386/mp_machdep.c,v
retrieving revision 1.238
diff -u -r1.238 mp_machdep.c
--- mp_machdep.c	1 Sep 2004 06:42:01 -0000	1.238
+++ mp_machdep.c	20 Sep 2004 20:50:35 -0000
@@ -738,15 +738,15 @@
 	int     x;
 	int     size = *(int *) ((u_long) & bootMP_size);
 	u_char *src = (u_char *) ((u_long) bootMP);
	u_char *dst = (u_char *) boot_address + KERNBASE;
 	u_int   boot_base = (u_int) bootMP;
 	u_int8_t *dst8;
 	u_int16_t *dst16;
 	u_int32_t *dst32;
 
 	POSTCODE(INSTALL_AP_TRAMP_POST);
 
-	pmap_kenter(boot_address + KERNBASE, boot_address);
+	pmap_map((vm_offset_t)dst, boot_address, boot_address + size, 0);
 	for (x = 0; x < size; ++x)
 		*dst++ = *src++;


>It seems odd that this is needed though.  Does it go away if you use 
>DISABLE_PSE or DISABLE_PGE?
>
I'll check this.

rik






Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?414F4AAC.5000807>