Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2001 09:41:03 -0700 From: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com> To: mjacob@feral.com Cc: Gordon Tetlow <gordont@gnf.org>, Ian Dowse <iedowse@maths.tcd.ie>, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Default retry behaviour for mount_nfs Message-ID: <3B585F1F.C6FCB9AC@mindspring.com> References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0107192247320.73652-100000@beppo>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Matthew Jacob wrote: > > Hmm, maybe we should implement the notion of "critical_local" and > > "critical_net" filesystems (a la NetBSD). Heck, I don't even need the > > distinction between net and local, just critical would do. All remote, > > critical filesystems would be blocking, and all others not. > > > > Sometimes the stick of POLA should be broken. > > Not if it adds work. I think the non-critical ones are the ones with the "-R1" option set... -- Terry To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3B585F1F.C6FCB9AC>