Date: Sun, 7 Nov 2010 22:29:18 +0100 From: Ulrich =?utf-8?B?U3DDtnJsZWlu?= <uqs@spoerlein.net> To: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Tricky subversion import, what to do? Message-ID: <20101107212918.GP85693@acme.spoerlein.net> In-Reply-To: <alpine.LSU.2.00.1011071715001.2311@hermes-2.csi.cam.ac.uk> References: <alpine.LSU.2.00.1011071715001.2311@hermes-2.csi.cam.ac.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 07.11.2010 at 17:18:43 +0000, Tony Finch wrote: > > this is about importing unifdef 2.4, which has no significant code > > changes, but that's not the point. > > I maintain unifdef and I haven't imported 2.4 because there are no code > changes. Please leave it alone. As I wrote, that's beside the point and not the question at hand. How/where should it end up in our tree? Is it vendor code? Is it contrib code? And if so how to bootstrap the correct subversion history ... Uli
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20101107212918.GP85693>