Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 14:00:04 -0500 From: "Doug Poland" <doug@polands.org> To: "Mark Huizer" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Cc: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: RE: Routing without ipfw? Message-ID: <NDBBKMNOJKJGAEKJNLIAGEHIELAA.doug@polands.org> In-Reply-To: <20001010191123.A15021@dohd.cx>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > > > Thanks for the response. I was attempting to get a > > routing box working and I hadn't compiled firewall > > options in the kernel yet. Since my box wasn't > > routing I wasn't sure of the relationship between > > natd and ipfw. Unfortunately, I'm still not routing > > correctly. > > > > Doug > > > That's a different question. Yes, you need ipfw for natd. > But ipfw is a loadable kernel module > > Mark So, logically, if you need natd for routing between interfaces, and natd needs ipfw, then ipfw is required for routing. Either compiled into the kernel or as a lkm? Confused, Doug > > > > > > > > Doug Poland wrote: > > > > > > > > Greetings all, > > > > > > > > Can I route ip between interfaces ( ed0 --> ed1 ) without > > > > ipfw? > > > > > > Yes. The simplest solution is to enable routing with /stand/sysinstall > > > during installation. > > > > > > HTH > > > -Christoph Sold > > > > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message > > -- > Nice testing in little China... > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?NDBBKMNOJKJGAEKJNLIAGEHIELAA.doug>