Date: Sat, 31 May 1997 15:49:17 -0700 (MST) From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org> To: tom@sdf.com (Tom Samplonius) Cc: jkh@time.cdrom.com, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: LINT and GENERIC - between a rock and a generic place. Message-ID: <199705312249.PAA11870@phaeton.artisoft.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.95q.970531142205.5044A-100000@misery.sdf.com> from "Tom Samplonius" at May 31, 97 02:26:48 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On Sat, 31 May 1997, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > > > More and more people are trying to use GENERIC as a template for their > > own kernels and they're losing, of course, because generic sets many > > limits (like max children or open files) too low. > > Now that we have login.conf this is pretty much a dead issue isn't it? > Why heavily customize the kernel config file, when you can do it with > login.conf? In fact the stock login.conf already has a "news" class for > news server. Jordan is speaking to hard limits. The login.conf speaks to soft limits, and is still limited to what it can set by the hard limits. The hard limits are the result of static allocations, general at initialization time before the kernel is really running, like globally declared arrays. AIX was probably right when it made all this stuff dynamic. Then you could at least sysctl the "hard limit" after the machine was up. Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199705312249.PAA11870>