Date: Tue, 2 May 1995 16:38:55 +0400 (GMT+0400) From: Anthony Graphics <agl@mac.glas.apc.org> To: Brant Katkansky <bmk@dtr.com> Cc: security@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Security options for NFS? Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.91.950502163618.21169A-100000@mail.redline.ru> In-Reply-To: <199505021046.DAA00960@dtr.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 2 May 1995, Brant Katkansky wrote: > Date: Tue, 2 May 1995 03:46:49 -0700 (PDT) > From: Brant Katkansky <bmk@dtr.com> > To: security@FreeBSD.org > Subject: Security options for NFS? > > I'm looking to secure NFS and other services not covered by tcpd - > what's the conventional wisdom for FreeBSD 2.0? > > Try to compile NFSD 2.1 or 2.2alpha1 (do not remeber where it is: check the back issues in comp.os.linux.announce) It does pretty the same thing that tcpd does I believe although I don't know whether resulting system would be considered "secure". A hint: never run pcnfsd ;-) AGL
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.LNX.3.91.950502163618.21169A-100000>