Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2017 07:27:53 +0000 From: "emilia" <emilia@disroot.org> To: "Kurt Jaeger" <lists@opsec.eu>, "Chris H" <portmaster@bsdforge.com> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Procmail Vulnerabilities check Message-ID: <20a9d9c7d9047905218f8dd3ade305c7@disroot.org> In-Reply-To: <20171211183649.GB2827@home.opsec.eu> References: <20171211183649.GB2827@home.opsec.eu> <20171211111031.GA92072@gmail.com> <32da0142ef01d545aff61de3a3946d62@udns.ultimatedns.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
December 11, 2017 7:39 PM, "Kurt Jaeger" <lists@opsec.eu> wrote:=0A=0A> T= he argument is: The update process for base is more complex=0A> than for = packages, and we've come a long way to have a very=0A> nice pkg-system, i= n general. The mid-term plan is thus to package base, too.=0A=0AThe non-p= ackaged base is one of the primary reasons I switched from debian to Free= BSD :)=0A=0A=0Aregards,=0Aemilia
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20a9d9c7d9047905218f8dd3ade305c7>