Date: Mon, 09 Aug 1999 13:27:18 +0100 From: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at> To: green@FreeBSD.org Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: quad_t and portability Message-ID: <E11DoWM-000LLp-00@fanf.noc.demon.net> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9908080043100.31981-100000@janus.syracuse.net> References: <199908080338.UAA01158@vashon.polstra.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"Brian F. Feldman" <green@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > >Is there anyone who is specifically checking for long long >C9X-compliancy in the source tree (mainly libc)? I started reviewing libc for C9X features in general -- a fair amount of work is required to update macros and typedefs in <inttypes.h> (plus the new <stdint.h>). Doing a thorough job is difficult because C9X is somewhat gratuitously incompatible with gnu C (e.g. the spelling of __complex__, zero-length arrays in structures, macro varargs, etc.) and gnu C doesn't yet support restrict. Tony. -- f.a.n.finch dot@dotat.at fanf@demon.net e pluribus unix To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?E11DoWM-000LLp-00>