Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2002 19:43:40 +1000 (EST) From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PUC_FASTINTR broken Message-ID: <20020904193553.C880-100000@gamplex.bde.org> In-Reply-To: <98247.1031127492@critter.freebsd.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 4 Sep 2002, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <20020904175411.B638-100000@gamplex.bde.org>, Bruce Evans writes: > >INTR_FAST is an option for pci devices. It was configured (not quite right) > >by the PUC_FASTINTR option, which should work just as well as the similar > >but much older CY_PCI_FASTINTR option (perfectly if the interrupt is not > >shared). > > It doesn't work right if the puc manages to register the interrupt as > FAST before we realize that it is shared. That is not a problem, since it is the configurer's responsibility to not use PUC_FASTINTR if it would not work. PUC_FASTINTR exists precisely to let the configurer make the correct choice, sint the driver and new-bus cannot. > >This change blows away the support for that option without even removing > >the option from conf/options, conf/NOTES or puc.4, and without even > >noting approval of the author of the code. > > I have yet to clean that fluff. Please don't. Bruce To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020904193553.C880-100000>