Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 15 Mar 2013 14:56:36 +0100
From:      Andre Oppermann <andre@freebsd.org>
To:        Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r248323 - head/sys/netinet
Message-ID:  <51432894.9000504@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <20130315134657.GL48089@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <201303151253.r2FCrsSs016150@svn.freebsd.org> <51431B89.5010501@freebsd.org> <20130315134657.GL48089@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 15.03.2013 14:46, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 02:00:57PM +0100, Andre Oppermann wrote:
> A> On 15.03.2013 13:53, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> A> > Author: glebius
> A> > Date: Fri Mar 15 12:53:53 2013
> A> > New Revision: 248323
> A> > URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/248323
> A> >
> A> > Log:
> A> >    - Use m_getcl() instead of hand allocating.
> A> >
> A> >    Sponsored by:	Nginx, Inc.
> A> >
> A> > Modified:
> A> >    head/sys/netinet/tcp_output.c
> A> >
> A> > Modified: head/sys/netinet/tcp_output.c
> A> > ==============================================================================
> A> > --- head/sys/netinet/tcp_output.c	Fri Mar 15 12:52:59 2013	(r248322)
> A> > +++ head/sys/netinet/tcp_output.c	Fri Mar 15 12:53:53 2013	(r248323)
> A> > @@ -842,23 +842,19 @@ send:
> A> >   			TCPSTAT_INC(tcps_sndpack);
> A> >   			TCPSTAT_ADD(tcps_sndbyte, len);
> A> >   		}
> A> > -		MGETHDR(m, M_NOWAIT, MT_DATA);
> A> > +#ifdef INET6
> A> > +		if (MHLEN < hdrlen + max_linkhdr)
> A> > +			m = m_getcl(M_NOWAIT, MT_DATA, M_PKTHDR);
> A> > +		else
> A> > +#endif
> A> > +			m = m_gethdr(M_NOWAIT, MT_DATA);
> A> > +
> A>
> A> m = m_getm2(hdrlen + max_linkhdr, M_NOWAIT, MT_DATA, M_PKTHDR);
> A>
> A> would be even more compact.  Since max_linkhdr could be large as well,
> A> the possibility of a cluster applies to IPv4 too.
>
> m_getm2() may return chain. According to argument list, you probably
> meant m_get2(). Yes, that would be more compat.
>
> But, again, I am not sure that using pagesized cluster won't break
> anything.
>
> If you are sure, feel free to change that.

Oops, I meant m_get2(), not m_getm2().

-- 
Andre




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?51432894.9000504>