Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 18:19:19 -0500 From: "Mikhail T." <mi+thun@aldan.algebra.com> To: Mathieu Arnold <mat@FreeBSD.org>, ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r409827 - in head/security: . pdfcrack Message-ID: <56D4D1F7.2030208@aldan.algebra.com> In-Reply-To: <7B14DFF0638A540FEF43D7B9@atuin.in.mat.cc> References: <201602292122.u1TLMm6J099029@repo.freebsd.org> <CAE79CE79ADF0657680A7F4F@atuin.in.mat.cc> <56D4BBFF.6000303@aldan.algebra.com> <08C8774B712D5304E9057EFF@atuin.in.mat.cc> <56D4CE62.8000309@aldan.algebra.com> <7B14DFF0638A540FEF43D7B9@atuin.in.mat.cc>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 29.02.2016 18:07, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
> The only reason to [...]
Mathieu, if you intend to lecture others on good practices, please,
include links to the rules you allege to be broken. Given our history of
disagreements, I'm not going to try to convince you again -- as long as
you aren't in a position to /compel/ me to accept your point of view.
> is when the ports are related. Those are not. At all.
I just explained, how the two /files/ are, in fact, related. I still
think, when a new file added to a repository begins life as a copy of
another, it is perfectly acceptable to record this relationship. In my
opinion. I'm not forcing it on you...
-mi
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?56D4D1F7.2030208>