Date: Tue, 06 May 2003 07:59:16 -0500 From: Eric Anderson <anderson@centtech.com> To: Sean Chittenden <sean@chittenden.org> Cc: Alan Jorge Markus <freebsd@staff.neoline.com.br> Subject: Re: FReebsd 5.0 network performance problem Message-ID: <3EB7B1A4.9090500@centtech.com> References: <001901c3137b$cc8d66f0$044ec7c8@AJMNOTEBOOK> <20030506065837.GT94932@perrin.int.nxad.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Sean Chittenden wrote: [..snip..] > Don't use 5.0 for production. If you are going to put anything in > production, use a _very_ recent -CURRENT. Even then, 5.0 isn't as > fast as the -STABLE series at the moment because it's still in an > awkward transition between locking via giant and fine grain locking. > If you'd like to help figure out performance problems for -CURRENT > however, have you tried running any kernel profiling to see where the > kernel is spending it's cycles? -sc What's the appropraite way to run kernel profiling, and how do you read/pull out the results? Eric -- ------------------------------------------------------------------ Eric Anderson Systems Administrator Centaur Technology Attitudes are contagious, is yours worth catching? ------------------------------------------------------------------
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3EB7B1A4.9090500>