Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2000 23:15:55 +0200 (IST) From: Roman Shterenzon <roman@harmonic.co.il> To: Alex Hayward <xelah@xelah.com> Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: KDE2 fails to compile in strangest possible way Message-ID: <970780555.39dcef8b31450@webmail.harmonic.co.il> In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10010051007420.11469-100000@sphinx.mythic-beasts.com> References: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10010051007420.11469-100000@sphinx.mythic-beasts.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Quoting Alex Hayward <xelah@xelah.com>: > KDE doesn't use CORBA. There have also been a number of reports on the > KDE > lists that recent sources have got a lot better performance wise, > including on low end machines. It's really not the right list, and I must admit that I dislike both of them, but it *seems* that KDE runs faster than GNOME. I mean the old KDE. This is strange due to the fact that KDE is C++ and GNOME is C and one would expect the C one to be faster. This hold true for both FreeBSD and Linux I've seen GNOME and KDE on. P.S. Lets not discuss it any further though :) --Roman Shterenzon, UNIX System Administrator and Consultant [ Xpert UNIX Systems Ltd., Herzlia, Israel. Tel: +972-9-9522361 ] To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?970780555.39dcef8b31450>