Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 20 Jun 2013 11:33:23 +0200
From:      =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Roger_Pau_Monn=E9?= <roger.pau@citrix.com>
To:        Jeroen van der Ham <jeroen@dckd.nl>
Cc:        "freebsd-xen@freebsd.org" <freebsd-xen@freebsd.org>, "Justin T. Gibbs" <gibbs@freebsd.org>, xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>, "freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org" <freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org>, "xen-users@lists.xen.org" <xen-users@lists.xen.org>
Subject:   Re: FreeBSD PVHVM call for testing
Message-ID:  <51C2CC63.9070505@citrix.com>
In-Reply-To: <54560214-F170-426E-BDF9-2295D8B8E982@dckd.nl>
References:  <519131D8.9010307@citrix.com> <519E54DE.5090304@citrix.com> <51B5E730.6070007@citrix.com> <51B9FF53.2020901@citrix.com> <54560214-F170-426E-BDF9-2295D8B8E982@dckd.nl>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 20/06/13 11:20, Jeroen van der Ham wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I have this running for a day or so now, but I'm noticing that the load averages seem a bit off:
> 
> $ uptime
> 11:17AM  up 17:14, 1 user, load averages: 0.31, 0.27, 0.21
> 
> This is for a clean install, with just enough installed to compile this kernel. In top I'm seeing that the machine is idling >98% of the time. But this does not correlate to the load displayed above.

This is probably due to the fact that we are not properly accounting for
blocked/runnable/offline time. Did you see the same when running the
XENHVM kernel without my patches?

Roger.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?51C2CC63.9070505>