Date: Sat, 16 May 1998 22:57:40 +0200 From: Ollivier Robert <roberto@keltia.freenix.fr> To: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Soft update vs noatime Message-ID: <19980516225740.A6032@keltia.freenix.fr> In-Reply-To: <l03020900b1830fcf8550@[194.32.164.2]>; from Bob Bishop on Sat, May 16, 1998 at 10:42:50AM %2B0100 References: <354E9212.500F9F30@whistle.com> <l03020900b1830fcf8550@[194.32.164.2]>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
According to Bob Bishop: > Is there any reason not to use noatime with soft updates? No reason except that it doesn't seem to be useful (in my tests of "cvs co" & "rm" anyway). -- Ollivier ROBERT -=- FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! -=- roberto@keltia.freenix.fr FreeBSD keltia.freenix.fr 3.0-CURRENT #59: Wed May 6 00:22:36 CEST 1998 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19980516225740.A6032>