Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 12:06:43 -0500 From: Will Andrews <will@csociety.org> To: Bradley T Hughes <bhughes@trolltech.com> Cc: Will Andrews <will@csociety.org>, freebsd-xfree86@lists.csociety.org, ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: HEADS UP: XFree86 4.2.0 going back in the tree Message-ID: <20020318170643.GM53073@squall.waterspout.com> In-Reply-To: <200203181800.01715.bhughes@trolltech.com> References: <20020315150609.GV53073@squall.waterspout.com> <200203180922.35707.bhughes@trolltech.com> <20020318155956.GD53073@squall.waterspout.com> <200203181800.01715.bhughes@trolltech.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Mar 18, 2002 at 06:00:01PM +0100, Bradley T Hughes wrote: > Threads have been enabled for libGL since XFree86 4.0 if I recall > correctly. I know you used a workaround in the qt2 port to get it to link > with libGL correctly. It's very annoying, but can be fixed with one > simple #define. I know when it was enabled. I did a workaround. But this does not answer my question: WHY? > As far as BIC issues, The only thing that it really changes is libGL no > longer uses pthread functions for storing thread specific data. So if somebody upgrades XFree86-4-libraries without upgrading their apps, their apps won't break? -- wca To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020318170643.GM53073>