Date: 29 May 2003 20:16:52 +0200 From: Koop Mast <einekoai@chello.nl> To: Thomas Moestl <t.moestl@tu-bs.de> Cc: freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: PLEASE TEST: interrupt assignment patch Message-ID: <1054232211.310.8.camel@healthy.prisma.quccc.org> In-Reply-To: <20030529113731.GB630@crow.dom2ip.de> References: <20030529113731.GB630@crow.dom2ip.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Op do 29-05-2003, om 13:37 schreef Thomas Moestl: > Hi, > > I would like to get the attached patch into 5.1; although I am quite > confident that it will not break anything, we need a good test coverage > (i.e. testing on many different models) to make sure this is the case, > since we are that close to a release. > > Therefore, I would very much appreciate if people could give this a > spin on their machines and report back. > > The aim of the patch is to fix the interrupt assignment on e450s; it > should not have any effect on other boxen. It has been tested so far > on two e450s, a Blade 100 and an u60. > > Thanks, > - Thomas On a Ultra 10 cpu0: Sun Microsystems UltraSparc-IIi Processor (440.00 MHz CPU) Only diff is in the dmesg: -pcib0: Sabre, impl 0, version 0, ign 0x7c0 +pcib0: Sabre, impl 0, version 0, ign 0x7c0, bus A -Koop
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1054232211.310.8.camel>