Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 11:40:49 -0500 From: Vivek Khera <vivek@khera.org> To: freebsd-stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Postfix and faststart Message-ID: <A9FA0EEE-AE15-4882-8293-E65CB8FE7D06@khera.org> In-Reply-To: <43C0C6BB.1000403@FreeBSD.org> References: <43BD2794.8020000@cnptia.embrapa.br> <43C01C75.6020504@FreeBSD.org> <43C0652D.90709@FreeBSD.org> <43C066B4.3060505@rogers.com> <43C06A2B.9030603@earthmagic.org> <43C0C6BB.1000403@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Jan 8, 2006, at 3:00 AM, Doug Barton wrote: > This idea has been discussed in the past, and it has a lot of > merit. I tend to have a fundamental opposition to adding new pseudo- > targets unless they are ABSOLUTELY necessary, since they add > complexity to the system and reduce flexibility with ordering. > However, this may actually be a case where it's both useful and > worth the cost. It would certainly get rid of the need for naming the startup scripts like 000.foo.sh to force it to happen.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?A9FA0EEE-AE15-4882-8293-E65CB8FE7D06>