Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2011 04:46:28 +0700 From: Eugene Grosbein <ports@grosbein.pp.ru> To: Florian Smeets <flo@FreeBSD.org> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/160273 and ports/160272 Message-ID: <4E751534.8070307@grosbein.pp.ru> In-Reply-To: <4E7512C1.2040400@FreeBSD.org> References: <201109172033.p8HKXqm8056115@freefall.freebsd.org> <4E7512C1.2040400@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
18.09.2011 04:36, Florian Smeets пишет: > Hi, > > now that AquaGatekeeper2 has been removed, do we still need AquaGatekeeper? > > I'm currently usure what to do with these PRs. I don't get why AquaGatekeeper2 in spite of PR fixing it: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/160273 That was mistake and it should be revived and fixed with the patch from the PR. Eugene Grosbein
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4E751534.8070307>