Date: Thu, 24 Jul 1997 08:47:23 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug White <dwhite@gdi.uoregon.edu> To: =?KOI8-R?B?4c7E0sXKIP7F0s7P1w==?= <ache@nagual.pp.ru> Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/www/apache Makefile ports/www/apache/files Makefile md5 ports/www/apache/patches patch-aa patch-ac patch-ad patch-ae patch-af patch-ag ports/www/apache/pkg PLIST Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.970724084349.1278E-100000@localhost> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.970724190512.20870A-100000@lsd.relcom.eu.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 24 Jul 1997, [KOI8-R] Андрей Чернов wrote: > > If the alpha is for NT, then why even bother porting it? > > They have some interesting enhancements. I mean case if you not use > new enhancements (old setup), the code is basically the same. But still, why bother? I've had someone in -questions ask the same thing that the people in this thread have. I think the userbase (and myself) would feel much more comfortable running the standard (and proven) 1.2.1 instead of a potentially buggy 1.3 alpha, even if they are "basically the same." Just because the code is "basically" the same doesn't mean there aren't hidden bugs that were created in the move to Winblows NT. Andrey, I think you're outnumbered...:) Doug White | University of Oregon Internet: dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu | Residence Networking Assistant http://gladstone.uoregon.edu/~dwhite | Computer Science Major Spam routed to /dev/null by Procmail | Death to Cyberpromo
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.970724084349.1278E-100000>