Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 16 Oct 2007 21:03:05 +0200
From:      Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Peter Schuller <peter.schuller@infidyne.com>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Status of MySQL on 7 w/o patches applied
Message-ID:  <47150AE9.9070400@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <20071016171721.GB6566@voi.aagh.net>
References:  <20071016110642.GB54457@hyperion.scode.org> <20071016171721.GB6566@voi.aagh.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Thomas Hurst wrote:
> * Peter Schuller (peter.schuller@infidyne.com) wrote:
> 
>> My question is - what is the expected status of MySQL performance in
>> FreeBSD 7 (without external patches) at this time?
> 
> Most if not all of the relevent patches were applied months ago.  We ran
> MySQL in production for some time using both patched and later unpatched
> 7-CURRENT with ULE for a while, and normal performance was easily
> comparible with Linux and Solaris.
> 
> We did see poor behavior with MySQL 5.1 and replication; the slave
> thread needed periodic restarts because it would use progressively more
> CPU and eventually fall behind, spending a long time in 'init' on every
> query, which we didn't see in other OS's.  Whether this was FreeBSD's or
> MySQL's fault I don't know, but one certainly didn't like the other.

When I tried mysql 5.1 on my usual benchmarks a few months ago, 
performance was terrible compared to 5.0.  I wondered if they had made 
some ill-conceived architectural changes that increased contention even 
more than within 5.0.  I didn't investigate it though.

Kris



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?47150AE9.9070400>