Date: Thu, 5 Nov 1998 10:16:11 -0800 (PST) From: Julian Elischer <julian@whistle.com> To: Craig Metz <cmetz@inner.net> Cc: enkhyl@hayseed.net, "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>, freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ipsec (VPN) for -current ? (Re: VPN through encrypted IP tunnel for FreeBSD? ) Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95.981105101411.5480C-100000@current1.whistle.com> In-Reply-To: <199811051312.NAA21643@inner.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Maybe the first step is to ask ALL the groups to present us with a set of include files that they can ALL live with. it should be possible for someone to generate include files that specify all the RFC specified values and constants, that ALL the groups can use. julian On Thu, 5 Nov 1998, Craig Metz wrote: > In message <Pine.BSF.4.05.9811050056500.317-100000@ender.sf.scient.com>, you wr > ite: > >IPsec is still an evolving standard, so I don't think there is a single > >implementation that's "finished", per se. > > The next release of NRL's IPv6+IPsec (due in order days) also supports > FreeBSD 3.0. > > All the implementations I know of have their strengths and their weaknesses. > > -Craig > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.95.981105101411.5480C-100000>