Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2007 15:02:23 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> To: Marcelo Araujo <araujo@FreeBSD.org> Cc: stas@freebsd.org, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/astro/gpsd Makefile Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.0.9999.0709011459150.905@ync.qbhto.arg> In-Reply-To: <200709012059.l81KxbHq080280@repoman.freebsd.org> References: <200709012059.l81KxbHq080280@repoman.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 1 Sep 2007, Marcelo Araujo wrote: > araujo 2007-09-01 20:59:37 UTC > > FreeBSD ports repository > > Modified files: > astro/gpsd Makefile > Log: > - Fix wrong PORTREVISION number in previous commit. > > Approved by: stas (mentor) > > Revision Changes Path > 1.8 +1 -1 ports/astro/gpsd/Makefile > > http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/astro/gpsd/Makefile.diff?&r1=1.7&r2=1.8&f=h Skipping a number (going from 1 to 3) doesn't hurt anything. Going backwards (from 3 to 2) is bad for a lot of reasons, not the least of which is automated tools that depend on monotonically increasing version numbers. If the time between the two commits is small enough this probably won't hurt anything, but please remember this for next time. Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.0.9999.0709011459150.905>