Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2002 07:50:04 -0700 (PDT) From: Peter Pentchev <roam@ringlet.net> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: conf/42324: rc.subr complains with sendmail_enable="NONE" Message-ID: <200209021450.g82Eo4Ek064081@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR conf/42324; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Peter Pentchev <roam@ringlet.net> To: Administrator <root@wlaptop.slackerbsd.org> Cc: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: conf/42324: rc.subr complains with sendmail_enable="NONE" Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2002 17:43:18 +0300 On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 02:37:48PM -0400, Administrator wrote: > > >Number: 42324 > >Category: conf > >Synopsis: rc.subr complains with sendmail_enable="NONE" > >Originator: Carl Schmidt > >Release: FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT i386 > >Organization: > >Environment: > System: FreeBSD wlaptop.slackerbsd.org 5.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT #0: Mon Sep 2 12:57:19 EDT 2002 root@wlaptop.slackerbsd.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/LAPTOP i386 > > >Description: > /etc/rc.subr complains about our sendmail_enable="NONE" option because > checkyesno() does not account for NONE. I receive a message which follows: > /etc/rc: WARNING: $sendmail_enable is not set properly. > > >How-To-Repeat: > Use sendmail_enable="NONE" in rc.conf. Could you use mta_startup_script="" instead? G'luck, Peter -- Peter Pentchev roam@ringlet.net roam@FreeBSD.org PGP key: http://people.FreeBSD.org/~roam/roam.key.asc Key fingerprint FDBA FD79 C26F 3C51 C95E DF9E ED18 B68D 1619 4553 What would this sentence be like if it weren't self-referential? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200209021450.g82Eo4Ek064081>