Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2004 04:32:34 -0500 (EST) From: "Brian Szymanski" <ski@indymedia.org> To: "Willem Jan Withagen" <wjw@withagen.nl> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: graid3 - requirements or manpage wrong? Message-ID: <2313.10.0.0.120.1101461554.squirrel@10.0.0.120> In-Reply-To: <41A5B95F.3060605@withagen.nl> References: <41A45A3F.5010008@anduin.net> <20041124171115.GP7232@darkness.comp.waw.pl> <6579E984-3E47-11D9-9576-000D9335BCEC@anduin.net> <20041125101405.GB7690@kevad.internal> <41A5B95F.3060605@withagen.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> That is not completely fair for vinum.... > > I've been running vinum now for the better of 3-4 years, and even with a > set of very flaky seagate IDE drives I never lost a byte. > Vinum has served me well, and I trust gvinum will get there as well. > I just left my fileserver at 5.1, which I know is not an option for > everybody. Are you using vinum Raid5 ? I'm considering rolling back to 5.1 myself if someone attests that things "just work" there with R5, then waiting for gvinum to mature before getting my machine back on stable. Also, when did vinum stop working in favor of gvinum? is it with 5.3? Could I expect 5.2.1 to work? Pardon the barrage of questions, but it would take me hours to test each case, so if anyone knows, drop me a line. Thanks! Brian Szymanski ski@indymedia.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?2313.10.0.0.120.1101461554.squirrel>