Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2011 21:35:19 +0000 (UTC) From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net> To: Daniel Eischen <eischen@vigrid.com> Cc: Randall Stewart <rrs@freebsd.org>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: UDP checksum broken, -head and releng_8 Message-ID: <20110108211712.T14966@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.64.1101081547160.28024@sea.ntplx.net> References: <Pine.GSO.4.64.1101070412140.19838@sea.ntplx.net> <20110107103837.E14966@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> <Pine.GSO.4.64.1101070613200.20933@sea.ntplx.net> <Pine.GSO.4.64.1101070640050.20933@sea.ntplx.net> <Pine.GSO.4.64.1101081320380.27326@sea.ntplx.net> <20110108185914.D14966@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> <Pine.GSO.4.64.1101081547160.28024@sea.ntplx.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 8 Jan 2011, Daniel Eischen wrote:
> Also, are there any restrictions with jail? If we're
> in a jail and can't find an address, do we really want
> to allow _any_ address set with an MC option? I've
> never used jails, but was just wondering if the
> application could somehow use an interface address
> that it wasn't allowed to use.
Yes, I think you can do that there but I'd hope the bind following
would fail it.
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb You have to have visions!
<ks> Going to jail sucks -- <bz> All my daemons like it!
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/jails.html
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110108211712.T14966>