Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 14 Apr 2002 04:22:01 +0200
From:      "Rogier R. Mulhuijzen" <drwilco@drwilco.net>
To:        Matt Simerson <freebsd@blockads.com>
Cc:        freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Is natd the right tool?
Message-ID:  <5.1.0.14.0.20020414041134.02cf8140@mail.drwilco.net>
In-Reply-To: <916461CE-4E33-11D6-8AF4-00306553B5E4@blockads.com>
References:  <20020411230121.E39738@blossom.cjclark.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Two tips

1) did you set up the divert to natd in your ipfw rules?
2) if you do the dig on the machine where natd is running and the external 
IP is routed over lo0 locally, ipfw will not see the packets as incoming on 
the interface where the IP is bound. So that means they will not match the 
ipfw rules that divert the packets to natd. I suggest trying the dig from a 
different host.

	Doc


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5.1.0.14.0.20020414041134.02cf8140>