Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2003 15:15:59 +0100 From: Paul Richards <paul@freebsd-services.com> To: Frank Durda IV <uhclem@freebsd.org> Cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/dev/matcd creativeif.h matcd.c matcd_data.h matcd_isa.c matcddrv.h options.h Message-ID: <20030617141559.GC58850@survey.codeburst.net> In-Reply-To: <m19SGhC-000MLmC@nemesis.lonestar.org> References: <m19SGhC-000MLmC@nemesis.lonestar.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 08:40:22AM -0500, Frank Durda IV wrote: > > uhclem 2003/06/16 18:20:03 PDT > > FreeBSD src repository > > > > Added files: > > sys/dev/matcd creativeif.h matcd.c matcd_data.h > > matcd_isa.c matcddrv.h options.h > > [-]paul@freebsd-services.com writes: > [-]Would a repo-copy of the old driver and then a commit of the changes > [-]have been better than just creating a new driver? > > On the advice of my counsel, er, mentor, no. This is because the previous > version did not live at this location in the tree. This version is at > /usr/src/sys/dev/matcd; the previous generation was at > /usr/src/sys/i386/isa/matcd. That's usually the situation when a repo copy is done. I guess Mark had a good reason. -- Tis a wise thing to know what is wanted, wiser still to know when it has been achieved and wisest of all to know when it is unachievable for then striving is folly. [Magician]
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030617141559.GC58850>