Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 14:07:47 +0200 From: "Simon L. Nielsen" <simon@FreeBSD.org> To: Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?= <des@des.no> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OpenSSL ports/base magic [was: [HEADS UP]: OpenLDAP+nss_ldap+nss_modules separated patch and more (SoC)] Message-ID: <20060824120745.GE1077@zaphod.nitro.dk> In-Reply-To: <86u043znbz.fsf@xps.des.no> References: <44E9582C.2010400@rsu.ru> <44EAA213.6010507@delphij.net> <002901c6c5ba$628b67d0$9800a8c0@carrera> <86hd0423zk.fsf@xps.des.no> <44EB302A.7010106@rsu.ru> <20060823121157.yawh6f8e844w4osc@netchild.homeip.net> <86u043znbz.fsf@xps.des.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2006.08.23 13:46:40 +0200, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: > Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net> writes: > > Michael Bushkov <bushman@rsu.ru> writes:(from Tue, 22 Aug 2006 > > > So, after all, I'd prefer to leave libldap (and nss_ldap, which can > > > also conflict with PADL's nss_ldap) as is and let users use > > > WITHOUT_LDAP and WITHOUT_NSS_LDAP when appropriate. > > If someone doesn't like the base system libldap, but wants the > > nss_ldap stuff, this way will not work out. While building the base > > system, no 3rd party libs are known to the build infrastructure. > > Wrong. It is already possible in today's tree to build the base > system's Kerberos with OpenLDAP support using the OpenLDAP port, and > there are similar provisions for using OpenSSL from ports. I know there are some magic in ports/ to use the ports version of OpenSSL, but I don't think there is anything done to support this in the base system, or have I missed that? (I'm interested as OpenSSL base system janitor to try to make sure I don't break something in the future by accident :-) ). -- Simon L. Nielsen
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060824120745.GE1077>