Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 1 Jun 2013 16:27:45 +0200
From:      =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fernando_Apestegu=EDa?= <fernando.apesteguia@gmail.com>
To:        Walter Hurry <walterhurry@gmail.com>
Cc:        User Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: FreeBSD10: lock order reversal with portsnap extract
Message-ID:  <CAGwOe2b2co0=MyGCWkB9M9g7dC4PET5wtXU4_VMnTjGFybkqbw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <koctqj$ba5$1@ger.gmane.org>
References:  <koctqj$ba5$1@ger.gmane.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
El 01/06/2013 15:44, "Walter Hurry" <walterhurry@gmail.com> escribi=F3:
>
> I'm installing FreeBSD10 (head; snapshot from 30 May 2013) into a VM.
>
> One of the first things I do is a 'portsnap fetch extract'. As soon as
> the extract starts it produces a 'lock order reversal' message with a KDB
> stack backtrace, but then proceeds successfully to verify the integrity
> and install the ports tree.
>
> Should I worry?

LORs should be avoided when possible but are not a bug per se.

You should check the pages listed here[1] to see if your lor has already
been reported.

Cheers.

[1] https://wiki.freebsd.org/LOR

>
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "
freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAGwOe2b2co0=MyGCWkB9M9g7dC4PET5wtXU4_VMnTjGFybkqbw>