Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 10 Feb 2017 15:32:49 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        freebsd-standards@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 209729] Defining RLIM_SAVED_MAX and RLIM_SAVED_CUR in sys/sys/resource.h according to POSIX.
Message-ID:  <bug-209729-15-HRtZVectjC@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-209729-15@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-209729-15@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D209729

--- Comment #3 from Konstantin Belousov <kib@FreeBSD.org> ---
After some more consideration, I think that the patch is mostly fine.  We do
not allow negative rlim_t values, converting them to RLIM_INFINITY.  So we =
can
argue that all resource limit values are representable by rlim_t.

I am asking portmgr to exp-run the patch, just in case.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-209729-15-HRtZVectjC>