Date: Mon, 05 May 2003 23:25:46 +0200 From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> To: "Andrey A. Chernov" <ache@nagual.pp.ru> Cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: `Hiding' libc symbols Message-ID: <xzp7k953x2d.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> In-Reply-To: <20030505212027.GA41263@nagual.pp.ru> (Andrey A. Chernov's message of "Tue, 6 May 2003 01:20:27 %2B0400") References: <20030501182820.GA53641@madman.celabo.org> <XFMail.20030501144502.jhb@FreeBSD.org> <20030501191027.GA53801@madman.celabo.org> <20030505110601.H53365@beagle.fokus.fraunhofer.de> <20030505175426.GA19352@madman.celabo.org> <xzpk7d53zu5.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <20030505205051.GA40572@nagual.pp.ru> <xzpbryh3y0k.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <20030505212027.GA41263@nagual.pp.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"Andrey A. Chernov" <ache@nagual.pp.ru> writes: > On Mon, May 05, 2003 at 23:05:15 +0200, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > > "Andrey A. Chernov" <ache@nagual.pp.ru> writes: > > > Better reject such error automatically at the linkage stage. Programmers > > > are always free to redefine their functions in case of conflict. > > There must be something wrong with my MUA, as I can't see a patch > > attached to your message. Could you please resend it? > Which one do you mean? The patch that makes the linker produce warnings or errors like you suggested. You seemed so convinced it was the best solution that I figured you had to have a patch ready to commit. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzp7k953x2d.fsf>