Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 09:28:32 -0700 From: Nate Lawson <nate@root.org> To: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Cc: Andriy Gapon <avg@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: run resume code only for S1-S4 states Message-ID: <49E9FFB0.6090707@root.org> In-Reply-To: <20090418125806.2a48b0a8@fabiankeil.de> References: <49DB639A.4090504@icyb.net.ua> <49DCF5C2.60805@root.org> <49DDF906.8090400@icyb.net.ua> <49DF3CA4.1090309@freebsd.org> <49E4B2A7.3020302@freebsd.org> <49E61986.7040709@root.org> <49E8AED0.1090008@freebsd.org> <20090418125806.2a48b0a8@fabiankeil.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Fabian Keil wrote: > Andriy Gapon <avg@freebsd.org> wrote: > >> An updated version of the patch, the only difference is: do-while(0) is gone, >> breaks are replaces with gotos, indentation is reduced. >> >> Per Nate's request I am calling for people with SMP systems to test if powering >> off via power button still works with this change. It's desirable to test power >> off at least two times to increase a chance of non-BSP CPU being used. > > With an AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 4600+ (2542.15-MHz K8-class CPU) > the first few shutdowns were successful, but on the fourth try pressing the > power button only lead to: > > Apr 18 12:52:42 kendra kernel: acpi: suspend request ignored (not ready yet) > Apr 18 12:52:42 kendra kernel: acpi: request to enter state S5 failed (err 6) > Apr 18 12:52:43 kendra kernel: acpi: suspend request ignored (not ready yet) > Apr 18 12:52:43 kendra kernel: acpi: request to enter state S5 failed (err 6) > Apr 18 12:52:43 kendra kernel: acpi: suspend request ignored (not ready yet) > Apr 18 12:52:43 kendra kernel: acpi: request to enter state S5 failed (err 6) > [...] Yes, I think the case for S5 should probably come before acpi_sleep_disable(). -- Nate
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?49E9FFB0.6090707>