Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 29 Aug 2018 01:14:39 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        emulation@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 230986] www/linux-flashplayer: Separate c6 and c7?
Message-ID:  <bug-230986-4077-Fu5w2Yp2tw@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-230986-4077@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-230986-4077@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D230986

--- Comment #2 from Jason W. Bacon <jwb@freebsd.org> ---

Yes, I'm aware that installing via make is easy, but that's not the problem=
.=20
The problem as that after doing so, the installation of all the c7 ports wi=
ll
get wiped and replaced with c6 equivalents by "pkg upgrade".

So it seems we should have separate c6 and c7 ports, as we used to with
linux-c*-flashplugin.

Both were replaced by a single linux-flashplayer port, so I wondered if this
change came with a clever way to preserve either a c6 or c7 environment thr=
ough
pkg upgrades.

Since it apparetnly did not, I would propose that we replace linux-flashpla=
yer
with linux-c6-flashplayer and linux-c7-flashplayer, which would be virtually
identical except for USES=3Dlinux:c*.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-230986-4077-Fu5w2Yp2tw>