Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2012 06:29:39 +0100 From: Zoran Kolic <zkolic@sbb.rs> To: Kurt Buff <kurt.buff@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: nomenclature for conf files Message-ID: <20121112052939.GA1309@mycenae.sbb.rs> In-Reply-To: <CADy1Ce6W4nfQHvHNx7YO9jEc6Aou9hjtHzdVV9xhxZ-rGzWhmQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <20121112051229.GA1235@mycenae.sbb.rs> <CADy1Ce6W4nfQHvHNx7YO9jEc6Aou9hjtHzdVV9xhxZ-rGzWhmQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > WITH_KMS=YES
> > WITH_KMS="YES"
> > WITH_KMS=yes
>
> With regard to their use in /etc/rc.conf, no, absolutely not.
> In general, from my experience, only the second one will work.
Yep, in rc.conf only the second one. I was thinking of make.conf.
It is the place kms should be set. Loader conf might take only
"" versions also.
Thank you and best regards
Zoran
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20121112052939.GA1309>