Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 14:31:19 -0800 (PST) From: Doug White <dwhite@gumbysoft.com> To: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> Cc: tinderbox@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [current tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64 Message-ID: <20050131143055.M10254@carver.gumbysoft.com> In-Reply-To: <20050131120605.C8759@carver.gumbysoft.com> References: <20050130130011.A9B0D7306E@freebsd-current.sentex.ca> <20050131120605.C8759@carver.gumbysoft.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 31 Jan 2005, Doug White wrote: > On Mon, 31 Jan 2005, M. Warner Losh wrote: > > > In message: <20050130073248.W20417@pooker.samsco.org> > > Scott Long <scottl@FreeBSD.org> writes: > > : Why on earth is the digi driver bein compiled on sparc64? > > > > Most likely historical inertia... No body noticed until that module > > build got more facist. > > The digi driver in HEAD is completely inoperative anyway, so removing it > from the kernel config wouldn't hurt anyone, for the time being. Sorry, s/HEAD/RELENG_5/. I'll go back in my corner now. -- Doug White | FreeBSD: The Power to Serve dwhite@gumbysoft.com | www.FreeBSD.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050131143055.M10254>