Date: Sun, 2 Feb 2003 15:42:58 +0300 From: "Andrey A. Chernov" <ache@nagual.pp.ru> To: Doug Barton <DougB@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>, current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: rand() is broken Message-ID: <20030202124258.GA63153@nagual.pp.ru> In-Reply-To: <20030202043722.E77226@12-234-22-23.pyvrag.nggov.pbz> References: <20030202070644.GA9987@rot13.obsecurity.org> <20030202090422.GA59750@nagual.pp.ru> <20030202091106.GA72723@rot13.obsecurity.org> <20030202102621.GA60900@nagual.pp.ru> <20030202123035.GB62977@nagual.pp.ru> <20030202043722.E77226@12-234-22-23.pyvrag.nggov.pbz>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Feb 02, 2003 at 04:38:53 -0800, Doug Barton wrote: > > I think it's worthwhile to wait till we get a chance to try arc4random(). This is libc's rand/random, it can't be fixed with arc4random() as designed. > Also, have you run the code you're proposing through the tests in the post > that David Schultz just made? This is fix form problem with 0, not for seed -> 1st value correlation. I can't deal with two problems with same time, lets be sequental. -- Andrey A. Chernov http://ache.pp.ru/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030202124258.GA63153>