Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:33:21 -0700 From: Rui Paulo <rpaulo@FreeBSD.org> To: mexas@bristol.ac.uk Cc: scottl@samsco.org, current@FreeBSD.org, net@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ipfilter(4) needs maintainer Message-ID: <9ED46F7A-8A5A-4668-8B00-D58278C9A0DA@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <201304141911.r3EJBMOb084882@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> References: <201304141911.r3EJBMOb084882@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2013/04/14, at 12:11, Anton Shterenlikht <mexas@bris.ac.uk> wrote: > A migration *guide*, yes. Tools to convert one syntax to = another: no. >=20 > ok, so what is the brief migraiton advice? It's still being written. > The Handbook mentions PF and IPFW. > I gather from your mails that PF is the recommended choice. > Is that so? Yes, because of how much easier it is to convert from ipf to pf version = ipf to ipfw. > If I choose PF, can I just follow the > Handbook PF section, and once it's working, > remove all IPF related kernel options and config > files? Yes, that will be the plan. Regards, -- Rui Paulo
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?9ED46F7A-8A5A-4668-8B00-D58278C9A0DA>