Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2000 21:04:12 +0100 (BST) From: Doug Rabson <dfr@nlsystems.com> To: Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@cs.duke.edu> Cc: mjacob@feral.com, John Baldwin <jhb@pike.osd.bsdi.com>, alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: what was the last patch you sent out? Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0009062103440.530-100000@salmon.nlsystems.com> In-Reply-To: <14773.14047.750044.76586@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 5 Sep 2000, Andrew Gallatin wrote: > > Matthew Jacob writes: > > > > Well, Rawhide boots. I sure wish I knew what the authors intended by saying > > "physical bus". I don't seems quite correct since we seem to have two > > I think its trying to map back to the DEQ SRM terminology where you > can have a "bus 0" on many different hoses. Eg, its directly tied > to the nexus & not behind a ppb. > > Does that make sense? This should be exactly what we have. > > > > different "physical bus" zeros here. On puropose I very carefully don't have > > overlapping cards (as in, same slot, different busses). > > Actually, that would be the most interesting to test. It ought to work fine. -- Doug Rabson Mail: dfr@nlsystems.com Nonlinear Systems Ltd. Phone: +44 20 8348 3944 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0009062103440.530-100000>