Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2001 10:20:30 -0800 From: bmah@acm.org (Bruce A. Mah) To: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: qa@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Should we test cdboot on 4.5 RC's? Message-ID: <200112181820.fBIIKVd22780@bmah.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: <XFMail.011217154614.jhb@FreeBSD.org> References: <XFMail.011217154614.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--==_Exmh_1551936902P Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii If memory serves me right, John Baldwin wrote: > Hmm, does anyone else think it might be worthwhile to MFC the new cdboot > replacement for the broken cdldr code in 4.x. If cdldr is broken anyways, sure, why not? > Then for the RC's we chould ship > two versions of each ISO, one with cdboot as the bootable image and the other > with boot.flp so we can have people test it and see how if cdboot works on mo > st > computers or not? The only difference in the ISO's is what image is set as > bootable on the mkisofs command line, other than that the images would both > have the same exact file contents. Note: There's some Makefile targets now in src/release that do mkisofs invocation. More tweakable knobs for the Makefile...yum! Bruce. --==_Exmh_1551936902P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD) Comment: Exmh version 2.3.1+ 05/14/2001 iD8DBQE8H4ju2MoxcVugUsMRArDsAJ9kbmugn5Rnc97Jb9dro2owD2HPZQCg+uDP 9k9ccMlO6BKw8lQHR7rjgww= =1VST -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==_Exmh_1551936902P-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-qa" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200112181820.fBIIKVd22780>