Date: Wed, 7 Jul 1999 22:46:19 -0500 (CDT) From: Mohit Aron <aron@cs.rice.edu> To: jlemon@americantv.com (Jonathan Lemon) Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: paper on improving webserver performance Message-ID: <199907080346.WAA27087@cs.rice.edu> In-Reply-To: <199907080340.WAA29430@free.pcs> from "Jonathan Lemon" at Jul 7, 99 10:40:30 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > This seems to indicate that you still have the overhead where the timer > fires, but no events are actually pending. True, but it avoids any pointer manipulations when timers are set and cancelled by TCP (which happens much more). Only if a timer is set by TCP that needs to fire earlier than the time that the timing wheel event handler needs to fire would you need to move around the timing wheel event. In any case, I'm very interested in your implementation since you appear to have seen faster performance results with it. - Mohit To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199907080346.WAA27087>