Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 26 Jan 2009 16:02:05 +0100
From:      n j <nino80@gmail.com>
To:        FreeBSD-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: KDE: What a monster!
Message-ID:  <92bcbda50901260702h503648b6gc5c17b1ae9f211e@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20090126150019.387d538b.freebsd@edvax.de>
References:  <20090123191547.fd43d651.ejcerejo@optonline.net> <20090125022647.6b379fed.freebsd@edvax.de> <20090125144428.B44198@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <20090126150019.387d538b.freebsd@edvax.de>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
Linus Torvalds on KDE4...

[quote]
Q: Another open source project that underwent a big change was KDE
with version 4.0. They released a lot of fundamental architectural
changes with 4.0 and it received some negative reviews. As a KDE user
how has this impacted you?

A: I used to be a KDE user. I thought KDE 4.0 was such a disaster I
switched to GNOME. I hate the fact that my right button doesn't do
what I want it to do. But the whole "break everything" model is
painful for users and they can choose to use something else.

I realise the reason for the 4.0 release, but I think they did it
badly. They did so many changes it was a half-baked release. It may
turn out to be the right decision in the end and I will re-try KDE,
but I suspect I'm not the only person they lost.

I got the update through Fedora and there was a mismatch from KDE 3 to
KDE 4.0. The desktop was not as functional and it was just a bad
experience for me. I'll revisit it when I reinstall the next machine
which tends to be every six to eight months.

The GNOME people are talking about doing major surgery so it could
also go the other way.
[/quote]

Full story: http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&taxonomyName=Software&articleId=9126619&taxonomyId=18&pageNumber=5

-- 
Nino



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?92bcbda50901260702h503648b6gc5c17b1ae9f211e>