Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2002 20:48:21 +0200 From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> To: "Andrew R. Reiter" <arr@watson.org> Cc: arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Trivial mbuf patch for review. Message-ID: <5974.1032374901@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 18 Sep 2002 14:30:44 EDT." <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1020918142918.51396A-100000@fledge.watson.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1020918142918.51396A-100000@fledge.watson.org>, "And rew R. Reiter" writes: > >The only comment I have is the same one I mentioned on irc (I guess it was >more in the form of a question) -- but for the record... > >Should m_length() return unsigned? Also, if not, should we fix below in >bpf.c where pktlen is unsigned? I've changed it to unsigned with no ill effects. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5974.1032374901>