Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2019 14:26:58 +0700 From: Eugene Grosbein <eugen@grosbein.net> To: Ed Maste <emaste@freebsd.org>, FreeBSD Hackers <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Making NO_CLEAN configurable through src.conf, possibly default Message-ID: <0dc164c2-0840-4abe-38e7-a5154c38689d@grosbein.net> In-Reply-To: <CAPyFy2DJ6R7qKuaem0a1LvVxLPkOfbVyYv7UNb3dqX5F-Tq42Q@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAPyFy2DJ6R7qKuaem0a1LvVxLPkOfbVyYv7UNb3dqX5F-Tq42Q@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
17.12.2019 16:54, Ed Maste wrote: > For several years I've built with NO_CLEAN, and would like us to > consider making it the default in the future. It used to be we > regularly made changes in the tree that required a clean build > (because of missing explicit dependencies, or because of limitations > in the way make automatically tracks dependencies), but for the last > couple of years we've added explicit workarounds when that happens. > > As a first step I've proposed having it be set via src.conf WITH_CLEAN > / WITHOUT_CLEAN knobs, in review https://reviews.freebsd.org/D22762. > What do folks think (of WITH_/WITHOUT_CLEAN and of making it the default)? Major upgrades or switching to META_MODE from older style still need clean obj directory.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?0dc164c2-0840-4abe-38e7-a5154c38689d>