Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 18:46:15 +0100 From: Anton Berezin <tobez@tobez.org> To: ijliao@FreeBSD.org, FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org, portmgr@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/32234: Perl ports not $LOCALBASE clean Message-ID: <20011127184615.D35261@heechee.tobez.org> In-Reply-To: <20011127124017.E55012@squall.waterspout.com>; from will@csociety.org on Tue, Nov 27, 2001 at 12:40:17PM -0500 References: <200111240315.fAO3Fgd22633@freefall.freebsd.org> <20011127172040.G32687@heechee.tobez.org> <20011127122059.B55012@squall.waterspout.com> <20011127183533.C35261@heechee.tobez.org> <20011127124017.E55012@squall.waterspout.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Nov 27, 2001 at 12:40:17PM -0500, Will Andrews wrote: > On Tue, Nov 27, 2001 at 06:35:33PM +0100, Anton Berezin wrote: > > Yes for p5- ports which use ExtUtils::MakeMaker in their Makefile.PL > > (the absolute majority do; I only know one perl module collection which > > does not, and it is not in the ports yet, and I co-authored it :-) ). > > I assume it is pretty easy to convert any troublemakers to use > ExtUtils::MakeMaker? No. If a module does not use MakeMaker, it must have a pretty good reason to do so - this basically means that said module does everything by itself, and most likely will either a) already be PREFIX-clean, or b) have to be modified in non-trivial ways to become PREFIX-clean. Let this not concern you. :-) \Anton. -- | Anton Berezin | FreeBSD: The power to serve | | catpipe Systems ApS _ _ |_ | http://www.FreeBSD.org | | tobez@catpipe.net (_(_|| | tobez@FreeBSD.org | | +45 7021 0050 | Private: tobez@tobez.org | To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20011127184615.D35261>