Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 12:11:15 -0800 From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> To: ports-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/ports-mgmt/portmaster/files portmaster.sh.in Message-ID: <4798F0E3.1030401@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20080124181741.GA37539@tirith.brixandersen.dk> References: <200801240236.m0O2awrw054388@repoman.freebsd.org> <20080124181741.GA37539@tirith.brixandersen.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
> Hi Doug,
>
> On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 02:36:58AM +0000, Doug Barton wrote:
>> dougb 2008-01-24 02:36:58 UTC
>>
>> FreeBSD ports repository
>>
>> Modified files: (Branch: 2.0)
>> ports-mgmt/portmaster/files portmaster.sh.in
>> Log:
>> The code for this 2.0 version has been totally reorganized, and
>> in several cases totally rewritten. I am also glad to say that
>> all of the advertised features now work as advertised. :)
> ...
>
> Did you just branch the ports CVS repo?
No, it's just a version number bump. AFAICT the "branch" stuff above is
added by the script that generates the e-mail. If you look at the cvs
logs themselves you can see that there are no branches.
But your concern is reasonable, I had a moment of panic myself when I
saw the e-mail. :)
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4798F0E3.1030401>